Date of OOT occurrence: |
|||||
A] OOT REPORTING: (To be completed by the analyst) |
|||||
Product / Material
Name |
|
QC Reference No. |
|
||
Batch No. |
|
Mfg. Date |
|
||
Specification No. |
|
Expiry Date |
|
||
Test Name |
|
Test Method
No. |
|
||
Stage of testing
(For Drug substance / Intermediate /
Drug product) (select the applicable
option) |
In-process
Finished product / Intermediate release testing
Stability Months
Accelerated / Long Term / Intermediate |
||||
Summary of OOT Test
Results (state result and specification) |
|||||
|
|||||
Details of abnormal observations noted during the
testing if any |
|||||
|
|||||
Analyst Name |
|
Signature & Date |
|
||
OOT Reference No.: |
B] LABORATORY INVESTIGATION: |
Sr. No. |
Check Parameters |
Observations (Yes/No/NA) |
Comments |
|||
1.0 |
Sampling |
|
|
|||
1.1 |
Any abnormal observation noted during
sampling? |
|
|
|||
1.2 |
Any noticeable difference in sample
appearance? |
|
|
|||
1.3 |
A sample is correctly collected & labeled? |
|
|
|||
1.4 |
Sample storage
was done appropriately? |
|
|
|||
2.0 |
General |
|
|
|||
2.1 |
Any unusual happening in lab?
(e.g. power failure) |
|
|
|||
2.2 |
Was the method discussed with the analyst? |
|
|
|||
2.3 |
The correct analytical method used? |
|
|
|||
2.4 |
The analyst was
trained to perform the test? |
|
|
|||
2.5 |
Correct glassware used for dilutions? |
|
|
|||
2.6 |
Glassware were
properly cleaned? |
|
|
|||
2.7 |
Instruments used
are qualified? |
|
||||
2.8 |
Instruments used
within calibration validity period |
|
||||
Instrument Used (Name &
Id) |
Calibration Due |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
2.9 |
Instrument setup & operation as per standard operating procedure? |
|
|
|||
2.10 |
Use of appropriate grade
of chemical and reagents within
the validity period? |
|
|
|||
2.11 |
|
|
||||
2.12 |
VS used |
Valid up to date |
Strength |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
OOT Reference No.: |
|||||
Sr. No. |
Check Parameters |
Observations (Yes/No/NA) |
Comments |
||
3.0 |
|||||
3.1 |
Sample &
Std preparations done
as per the
test method? |
|
|
||
3.2 |
Is any
weighing error identified? |
|
|
||
3.3 |
Correct potency of the standard used in the calculation? Standard is within the validity period? |
|
|
||
3.4 |
Std(s) Used |
Valid up to date |
Potency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
Is the sample
properly shaken, sonicated or heated / warmed
as per method of analysis? |
|
|
||
3.6 |
Are the sample / standard dilutions correctly performed as per method of analysis? |
|
|
||
3.7 |
Any noticeable preparation? Difference noted in the sample/Standard |
|
|
||
3.8 |
Are the samples filtered/ centrifuged / membrane filtered properly before introduction into the instrument or analysis by classical method? |
|
|
||
3.9 |
Are samples/standards preparations stored under correct environment/time before
analysis? |
|
|
||
3.10 |
Tablets/granules are ground properly? |
|
|
||
3.11 |
Any errors
in calculation and
transcription? |
|
|
||
4.0 |
Chromatography |
||||
4.1 |
Correct Column
Used (E.g. column make, Dimension, Particle Size, End capped / Non-End
capped, Pore Size, Carbon Loading)? |
|
|
||
4.2 |
Any leakages observed in the
fittings? |
|
|
||
4.3 |
Correct
instrument parameters used (e.g. for HPLC – type of detector, flow rate, oven
temp., wavelength, injection volume, sample temp.
For GC – type of detector, flow
rate, oven temp. Injection volume, Inj. Temp,
detector temp.)? |
|
|
||
4.4 |
Mobile phase preparation is as per the method (check for composition, pH, air bubbles)? |
|
|
||
4.5 |
Any unusual or unexpected response
observed with standard or test
preparations? |
|
|
||
4.6 |
System suitability acceptance criteria were met during the analysis? |
|
|
OOT Reference No.: |
|||
Sr. No. |
Check Parameters |
Observations (Yes/No/NA) |
Comments |
5.0 |
Dissolution |
||
5.1 |
Correct
instrument parameters used (apparatus type,
speed, bath temperature, time, medium used, volume)? |
|
|
5.2 |
Dissolution Medium
Degassed? |
|
|
5.3 |
Sample Withdrawn Correctly? |
|
|
5.4 |
Correct Filter
Used? |
|
|
6.0 |
Microbiological Assay (Note: Relevant points stated under
Sr. nos. 1, 2 &
3 shall also be checked, as applicable) |
||
6.1 |
Was media
from a single prepared lot used in the assay? |
|
|
6.2 |
Was there
any malfunction or breakdown of the incubator? |
|
|
6.3 |
Was the temperature of the incubator during the incubation period as per requirement? |
|
|
6.4 |
Are the zones of inhibition/exhibition clearly defined? |
|
|
6.5 |
Is the merging of zones seen? |
|
|
6.6 |
Was zone
reading done as per SOP? |
|
|
6.7 |
Is the Zone reader/vernier calipers in the calibrated state? |
|
|
|
Instrument ID: Calibration due date: |
|
|
7.0 |
Stability |
||
7.1 |
Any malfunction or breakdown of stability chamber? |
|
|
7.2 |
Any failure of utilities (power, water, UPS)? |
|
|
7.3 |
Any deviation in temperature / humidity monitoring? |
|
|
7.4 |
Any damage
to pack? |
|
|
7.5 |
Any deviation from SOP for
sample pull out time? |
|
|
7.6 |
Were samples, after pull out, stored as
per the conditions specified in the SOP? |
|
|
7.7 |
Were samples analysed within the specified time period as in
the SOP? |
|
|
7.8 |
Any change
in method of analysis or specification? |
|
|
7.9 |
Any other
(to be specified) |
|
|
OOT Reference No.: |
|
8.0 |
Any other
findings (review of method validation data, Trend data
etc.): |
|
|
||
Was similar OOT reported for
this product earlier? If yes,
state the identified cause and corrective / preventive actions
taken that time
– |
|||
10.0 |
LABORATORY ERROR
IDENTIFIED : Yes / No |
||
If yes,
describe the error: |
|||
QC Analyst
(Sign &
Date) |
Section In-charge of QC (Sign & Date) |
||
11.0 |
ACTION TO BE FOLLOWED ( In
case of lab error) |
Yes/No |
Comment |
11.1 |
Retesting of retained sample
solution by Original Analyst |
|
|
11.2 |
Retesting of retained sample
by Original Analyst |
|
|
11.3 |
Correction in document |
|
|
11.4 |
Any other
(To be specified) |
|
|
|
Section In-charge Of QC (Sign &
Date): |
|
OOT Reference No.: |
|||||
12.0 |
ACTION TO BE FOLLOWED (In case
of obvious error
related to sampling or sample handling) |
||||
REASON FOR
RE-SAMPLING: |
|||||
RE-SAMPLING PLAN: |
|||||
Total number
of containers |
|
||||
Number of containers to be sampled |
|
||||
Sample quantity from each container |
|
||||
Remarks or Special instructions: |
|||||
QC In-charge (Sign &
date) |
QA In-charge (Sign &
date) |
||||
13.0 |
RESULT OF RETEST (in case of obvious lab
/ sampling error): |
||||
1. |
2. |
Average = |
|||
QC Analyst
(Sign &
Date) |
QC In-charge (Sign &
Date) |
||||
CONCLUSION: OOT
test result Valid, Report
the initial result Invalid, Report
new results If OOT is valid,
Initiation of Manufacturing Investigation |
|||||
QA In-charge: (Sign &
Date) |
|||||
C] |
MANUFACTURING INVESTIGATION: |
||||
For details, refer to Annexure 4 - Manufacturing Investigation Form.
Manufacturing Error
detected: Yes / No |
|||||
Production In-charge (Sign &
Date) |
QA In-charge (Sign &
Date) |
||||
|
QA decision on disposition of the batch:
QA In-charge (Sign &
Date) |
||||
OOT Reference No.: |
|||
D] |
CLOSURE OF OOT INVESTIGATION |
||
|
Summary and Conclusion: (Based on report of Laboratory / Manufacturing investigations)
Assignable Cause:
Corrective Action
and Preventive Action:
If CAPA
not completed within
30 days, CAPA ref. no. |
||
QC In-charge (Sign &
Date) |
Production In-charge (Sign &
Date) |
QA In-charge (Sign &
Date) |
|
List of Attachments (if any): |
0 Comments