HOT POST

50/recent/ticker-posts

Header Ads Widget

Design Qualification for Vibro Sifter


XYZ Limited

MANUFACTURES OF PAHRMACEUTICAL EQUIPMENT


Address:



TABLE OF CONTENTS 

1.0    Pre-Approval

2.0    Overview

2.1    Purpose

2.2    Responsibility

2.3    Requalification

2.4    System Description

3.0   Performance Qualification Procedure

3.1   Test procedures.

3.2   Deficiency (if any) and corrective Action Report

4.0    Acceptance Criteria

5.0    Remarks (if any)

6.0   Summary

6.1    Conclusion

6.2    Post –Approval

7.0    Appendix

7.1    Abbreviations

7.2    List of documents


1.0    Pre-Approval

  • Signing of this Approval page of Performance Qualification Protocol indicates agreement with the Performance Qualification approach described in this document. Should Modifications to the Performance Qualification become necessary; an addendum will be prepared and approved.

2.0    Overview

2.1    Purpose:

The purpose of this protocol is to provide an outline for the Performance of equipment for static attributes to verify that:

  • Machine is performing as per functional requirement mention in design specifications.

2.2    Responsibility:

The validation group comprising of a representative from each of the following departments shall be responsible for the overall compliance with this protocol:  

  • Project Department
  • Engineering Department
  • Production Department
  • Quality Assurance Department

The Projects and Engineering Department shall be responsible for checking proper process validation and recording validation data as per the procedures outlined in this protocol.

The Quality Assurance Department shall be responsible for the final review of the qualification documents and its compliance to meet the acceptance criteria of the Performance Qualification protocol.

The summary report shall be approved by the head of Project, Engineering, Production and Quality Assurance.

2.3    Requalification:

           Performance Qualification to be re-qualified on:

  • Replacement of major component of the equipment with a new component.
  • Any major modification in the existing equipment.
  • Any change in validation parameter.
  • Shifting of the equipment from one location to another.

2.4    System Description

  • Ribbon Blender is used for mixing dry or dump materials and used for tablet granulation. It consists of a 'U' shaped trough, solid SS end plates, SS shaft with specially designed paddles. The shaft is coupled with heavy duty gear box & motor. The shaft is supported on heavy duty bearing blocks at both the ends and provided with Teflon seals & stuffing box.
  • Top cover is provided with SS grill structure for easy visibility during mixing operation. The motor- gear box assembly is completely covered in enclosure on/off push button box is provided with the machine with DOL starter. All SS parts are polished to mirror finish from inside mirror and outside parts are matt finished.

Salient Features

  • Standard and GMP model with contact parts in SS 316 quality.
  • Top cover with SS lid.
  • Solid stainless-steel end covers and frame work on the trough in even standard models for long trouble-free life of the machine. 


Technical Specifications


3.0       Performance Qualification Procedure

3.1    Test procedures.

  • Output capacity Test
  1. Procedure: Make all the initial setting of the machine to get desired capacity
  2. Acceptance Criteria: Machine should be capable of doing the set parameter
  • Output Quality Chart

Sr. No

Processed material at regular interval

Accepted

Rejected

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Remarks

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



3.2    Deficiency (if any) and Corrective Action Report

If there is no deficiency, then write N. A. 

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



Checked by

(Project)

 

Name

 

Sign.

 

Date


Verified by

(Engineering)

 

Name

 

Sign.

 

Date



4.0 Acceptance Criteria  

Performance Qualification shall be considered acceptable when all the conditions specified in various forms under section 3.0 have been met.

Any deviation from the acceptance criteria of the specific check point shall be reported and decision should be taken for the rejection, replacement or rectification of the equipment/component.

 

5.0    Remarks (if any):

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

6.0    Summary:

Checks

Observations

Remarks

Whether acceptance criteria of the protocol and Specific check points are met.


Yes/No

 



6.1       Conclusion:

Mass Mixer bearing Mac No. ------ Is / Is Not qualifying the performance qualification test as per the guideline described in this Protocol Can Be / Not Be tested for its performance qualification.



6.2     Post-Approval Signatures




7.0      Appendix

7.1      Abbreviations 

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


7.2      List of Documents

1.     M.O.C. of S.S. 316 & 304 Quality Material

2.     Motor Certificate

3.     Gasket Certificate

4.     G.A. Drawing 




Design Qualification for Vibro Sifter Template

 

Post a Comment

0 Comments

close